Africa Wrestles With Asia Over Chevron’s Investment Pie

Chevron expended about $2.8Billion on various offshore development and natural gas projects in Africa in 2015; in Nigeria, Angola and Republic of the Congo.

This was less than a fifth of the $16.6Billion the American major expended in oil and gas producing activities and non-oil and gas producing activities to advance the development of proved undeveloped reserves in the year.

Australia accounted for the largest of the company’s spend: about $6.4Billion, or 39% of the total, mainly for development and construction activities at the Gorgon and Wheatstone LNG projects.

In Asia, expenditures during the year totalled approximately $3.2Billion, or 19.5% of the company’s overall spend, primarily related to development projects of the TCO affiliate in Kazakhstan, and in Thailand.

 The United States and Canada queued behind Africa. In the former, expenditures of about $2.7Billion related primarily to various development activities in the Gulf of Mexico and the midcontinent region. Development activities in Canada were primarily responsible for about $1.5Billion.

At year-end 2015, Chevron held approximately 2.2Billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) of proved undeveloped reserves that have remained undeveloped for five years or more. The majority of these reserves are in three locations where the company has a proven track record of developing major projects.

In Australia, approximately 500Million BOE have remained undeveloped for five years or more related to the Gorgon Project. The company is currently constructing liquefaction and other facilities in Australia to develop this natural gas. In Africa, approximately 400Million BOE have remained undeveloped for five years or more, primarily due to facility constraints at various fields and infrastructure associated with the Escravos gas projects in Nigeria.

Reserves that remain proved undeveloped for five or more years are a result of several factors that affect optimal project development and execution, such as the complex nature of the development project in adverse and remote locations, physical limitations of infrastructure or plant capacities that dictate project timing, compression projects that are pending reservoir pressure declines, and contractual limitations that dictate production levels.


Sponsored

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Comment form

All fields marked (*) are required

© 2021 Festac News Press Ltd..